Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Household Consumer Expenditure Survey: 64th Round, Schedule 1.0, July 2007 - June 2008
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-NSSO-64-SCHEDULE-1.0 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office,NSSO |
| Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & P.i, Govenment of Indis - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) | |
| Metadata |
 Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Aug 21, 2015
Last modified
Aug 22, 2015
Page views
287852
- Identification of Sa
mple Household - Household Characteri
stics - Demographic and othe
r particulars of hou
sehold members - Consumption of food,
pan, tobacco , into
xicants and fuel dur
ing the last 30 days - Consumption of cloth
ing, bedding and foo
twear during the las
t 365 days - Expenditure on educa
tion , medical (inst
itutional) goods and
services during the
last 365 days and e
xpenditutre on misce
llaneous goods and s
ervices including, r
ents and taxes durin
g the last 30 days - Expenditure for purc
hase and constructio
n (including repair
and maintenance) of
durable goods for do
mestic use during th
e last 365
Variable Groups
Meal recieved on payment
(Meals_Payment)
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 34477 Invalid: 0 |
Definition
meals received on payment' will mean that the informant has to incur some expense or part with a certain portion of his salary/wage for getting the meals. Meals purchased from hotel, restaurant or an eating-house will be considered as 'meals taken away from home on payment'
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3410 |  9.9%
| |
| 00 | 23851 | 69.2%
| |
| 01 | 235 | 0.7%
| |
| 02 | 400 | 1.2%
| |
| 03 | 92 | 0.3%
| |
| 04 | 290 | 0.8%
| |
| 05 | 107 | 0.3%
| |
| 06 | 195 | 0.6%
| |
| 07 | 31 | 0.1%
| |
| 08 | 125 | 0.4%
| |
| 09 | 25 | 0.1%
| |
| 1 | 249 | 0.7%
| |
| 10 | 565 | 1.6%
| |
| 11 | 12 | 0.0%
| |
| 12 | 208 | 0.6%
| |
| 13 | 10 | 0.0%
| |
| 14 | 55 | 0.2%
| |
| 15 | 170 | 0.5%
| |
| 16 | 80 | 0.2%
| |
| 17 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 18 | 66 | 0.2%
| |
| 19 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 2 | 705 | 2.0%
| |
| 20 | 377 | 1.1%
| |
| 21 | 28 | 0.1%
| |
| 22 | 39 | 0.1%
| |
| 23 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 24 | 78 | 0.2%
| |
| 25 | 76 | 0.2%
| |
| 26 | 42 | 0.1%
| |
| 27 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 28 | 13 | 0.0%
| |
| 29 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 3 | 255 | 0.7%
| |
| 30 | 247 | 0.7%
| |
| 32 | 13 | 0.0%
| |
| 33 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 34 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 35 | 12 | 0.0%
| |
| 36 | 20 | 0.1%
| |
| 37 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 38 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 39 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 4 | 502 | 1.5%
| |
| 40 | 75 | 0.2%
| |
| 42 | 12 | 0.0%
| |
| 43 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 44 | 14 | 0.0%
| |
| 45 | 44 | 0.1%
| |
| 46 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 48 | 20 | 0.1%
| |
| 5 | 212 | 0.6%
| |
| 50 | 48 | 0.1%
| |
| 51 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 52 | 35 | 0.1%
| |
| 53 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 54 | 19 | 0.1%
| |
| 55 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 56 | 33 | 0.1%
| |
| 57 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 58 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 59 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 6 | 292 | 0.8%
| |
| 60 | 565 | 1.6%
| |
| 61 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 62 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 64 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 66 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 69 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 7 | 21 | 0.1%
| |
| 70 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 72 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 75 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 76 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 78 | 15 | 0.0%
| |
| 8 | 168 | 0.5%
| |
| 80 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 81 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 82 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 84 | 11 | 0.0%
| |
| 85 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 86 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 87 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 9 | 58 | 0.2%
| |
| 90 | 132 | 0.4%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.